Assessment - Form 1
|
Unit/Team: |
Reported By: |
|
Date Submitted: |
Assessment Period: 2005 -2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: Provide student services that meet the
needs of our population; serve our communities through
multiple educational sites |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The student success center is
the synergized entity created by joining academic advising, the tutorial
center and the assessment center. The |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Students will be tested in a
timely manner. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Students who are tested will be
given an exit survey to determine their satisfaction with the testing
experience. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: Based on an exit survey, at
least 70% of students will report that testing started on time. Secondary Target: Less than 20 %of students who
reported the test did not start on time will indicate that the delay was due
to computer problems |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Primary: Over 85% of students
reported both the entrance and exit exam started on time at the Cartersville
and Placement – 96% started on time Exit - 88% started on time Cartersville: Placement- 90% started on time Exit- 93% started on time Secondary: In Cartersville, 9.5%
of students reporting a delay in test start time indicated that it was due to
computer problems. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: Students
reported only a few problems with computers and it appeared that the wording
of the survey produced a halo effect. The questions should be reworded and
put in the negative. For example, instead of “testing was delayed by computer
problems”, the statement should be “testing was not delayed by computer
problems.” |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
Assessment - Form 1
|
Unit/Team: |
Reported By: Carolyn Parks |
|
Date Submitted: |
Assessment Period: 2005 - 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: Provide
student services that meet the need of our population; serve our communities through
multiple education sites; be innovative in our approach to teaching, learning
and support services |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The student success center is
the synergized entity created by joining academic advising, the tutorial
center and the assessment center. The |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Student participation in
academic advising activities will increase. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Student participation in
Advising DAZE will be monitored by having faculty report the number of students they advise during this activity. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: There will be a 20 percent increase
in students’ participation in Advising Daze from spring 05-spring 06. Secondary Target: |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Increase in student
participation was 23.40% 2006 results Location Acworth – 24 Cartersville 103 Floyd – 54 |
|
|
Recommended Actions: Additional efforts have been
made to increase participation at all locations, and will be monitored next
year. Faculty will be asked for their
input concerning time and location. Incentive programs for students and faculty
who participate will be investigated. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
Assessment - Form 1
|
Unit/Team: |
Reported By: |
|
Date Submitted: Jan. 3oth, 2006 |
Assessment Period: 2005- 2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: Provide student services that
meet the need of our population; serve our communities through
multiple education sites |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The student success center is
the synergized entity created by joining academic advising, the tutorial
center and the assessment center. The |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Students will be aware of the
services offered by the tutorial centers. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: The number of student contacted by the
tutorial staff in Cartersville will be monitored using an
electronic sign in. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: Ten percent of students in math
classes will use the tutor in Cartersville. Secondary Target: Eighty percent of students using
tutorial services will receive passing grades in their math class. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): 11 % of students enrolled in math classes
in Cartersville used the tutorial service. ( 51 out of 444) 94 % of students who used the tutorial
center received a passing grade in math (3 F’s, 3 W’s and 3 IP’s – Only the f’s were used in the calculation. |
|
|
Recommended Action Electronic sign in should be
used at all campuses. Results for Cartersville campus should be compared to More attempts should be made to
inform students of tutorial services. English tutorial usage should be
monitored in the same way as the math services. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|