|
Unit/Team: Health Science |
Reported By: B. Rees |
|
Date Submitted: |
Assessment Period: AY 2005-2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related Institutional Goal &
Objective: Be involved in our communities
and responsive to their needs |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The Division of Health Sciences supports |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Every health science student
will participate in voluntary health related community activities. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Nursing: All students will
submit a portfolio which contains records of student participation in
voluntary community hours. Dental Hygiene: All students
will submit a form for faculty approval and documentation of all community
presentations. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Nursing: 100% of the students
will demonstrate evidence of participating in 8 hours per year (total 16
hours for generic students and 8 hours for LPNs and
Paramedics) of voluntary community health related activities. Dental Hygiene: 100% of the
students will participate in table clinics and community presentations. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Nursing: 97% of the students
completing the nursing program demonstrated evidence of completing the
voluntary community health related activities. Dental Hygiene: 100% of the
student participated in table clinics and community presentations. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: Nursing: An alternate method for
tracking volunteer hours has been identified. Additional methods for
identifying volunteer hours are being explored. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
|
Unit/Team: Health Sciences |
Reported By: |
|
Date Submitted: |
Assessment Period: 2005-2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: Provide Career programs that
complement community needs |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The Division of Health Sciences supports |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Retention of students in the
first semester of the nursing program will exceed the overall retention rate
for the last three years (66%). |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Collect and compare data on
retention of student in the first semester of nursing. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: 75% of the generic students will
pass the first semester of nursing. Secondary Target: 75% of LPN and |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): 81.9% of generic students
(86/105) completed successfully completed the first semester of nursing. 68.4 % of LPN bridge students (13/19) and 75% (6/8) of
Paramedic bridge students completed the first semester in nursing |
|
|
Recommended Actions: The Student Success Project focused
on retention is now in its second year and retention rates are rising. The
Project will continue with subsequent classes and collect and aggregate data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
|
Unit/Team: Health Science |
Reported By: B. Rees |
|
Date Submitted: |
Assessment Period: AY 2005-2006 |
|
|
|
|
Related Institutional Goal &
Objective: Be innovative in our approach to
teaching, learning, and support services. |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The Division of Health Sciences supports |
|
|
Expected Outcome: FT and PT faculty will receive a
satisfactory rating on their annual faculty evaluation, with little
discernable difference between the two groups. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Nursing: A “Student Evaluation
of Clinical Experience” survey will be completed by all students for both FT
and PT clinical instructors. Dental Hygiene: A “Clinical
Instructor Evaluation” survey will be completed by all students for both FT
and PT clinical instructors. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: Nursing: Student
evaluations of FT and PT faculty will have mean score of 3.00 or higher on a
4.00 scale on the “Student Evaluation of Clinical Experience”. Dental Hygiene: Student evaluations
of FT and PT faculty will have a mean score of 3.00 on a 5.00 scale on the
“Clinical Instructor Evaluation”. Secondary Target: Nursing: The annual faculty evaluation
for FT and PT faculty will include a satisfactory or outstanding rating on
80% of the criteria. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Primary Target: Nursing: Student
evaluations of four PT faculty in Fall 2005 had a
mean score of 3.23 or higher on the 35 questions pertaining to faculty
instruction. All student evaluations of eleven FT faculty had a mean score of
3.15 or higher on these same 35 questions pertaining to faculty instruction. Dental Hygiene: Student
evaluations of all FT and PT faculty had a mean score of 3.00 or higher. Secondary Target: Nursing: The
annual evaluations of all FT and PT faculty included a satisfactory or
outstanding rating on 83% of the criteria. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|