|
Unit/Team: Extended Learning |
Reported By: L. Henderson |
|
Date Submitted: 7/11/06 |
Assessment Period: 2005-2006
Academic year |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: 8: Be innovative in our approach to teaching, learning, and support services |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The experience of a student participating
in a extended learning course will parallel the experience of a student in a
conventional delivery course |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Students will
be better prepared for the rigors of online learning and the specific skills
required. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: A student
page will be developed and posted on a college web page that offers the
student clear guidelines for the minimum technology requirements and an
interactive assessment tool will be developed to allow the students to
self-evaluate their readiness for online learning. College course surveys
will be added to all DL courses. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: 65% of students
taking the survey will respond positively on question 18: Orientation
materials and/or meetings provided for FCTV, College by cassette, GSAMS, or
Internet/network courses are helpful. Secondary Target: 65% of those
enrolled in Distance Learning courses will respond to the survey. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): |
|
|
Recommended Actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
|
Unit/Team: Extended Learning |
Reported By: L. Henderson |
|
Date Submitted: 7/11/06 |
Assessment Period: 2005-2006
Academic year |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: 8: Be
innovative in our approach to teaching, learning, and support services |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The experience
of a student participating in a extended learning course will parallel the
experience of a student in a conventional delivery course |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Students in
Extended Learning courses will engage in the analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation of material. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Faculty will
answer question 2 related to analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of material
on the Extended Learning Faculty Survey. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: 90% of faculty
will provide opportunities for students to engage in the analysis, synthesis,
and evaluation of material. Secondary Target: 65% of said
faculty will indicate that the methodology for such engagement is comparable
to that used in a traditional course. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Primary: 100% of faculty provide such opportunities. Secondary: 68% of faculty
indicated that the methodology is comparable to that used in a traditional
course. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
|
Unit/Team: Extended Learning |
Reported By: L. Henderson |
|
Date Submitted: 7/11/06 |
Assessment Period: 2005-2006
Academic year |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: 8: Be
innovative in our approach to teaching, learning, and support services |
|
|
Unit/Team Goal: The experience
of a student participating in a extended learning course will parallel the
experience of a student in a conventional delivery course |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Extended
Learning faculty will regularly review instructional material to keep pace
with technological innovations. |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Faculty will
answer question 1 related to review of instructional materials on the
Extended Learning Faculty Survey. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: 90% of faculty
will review their instructional materials at least once a year. Secondary Target: 60% of faculty
will review their instructional materials once a semester. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Primary: 100% of faculty review their materials at least once a year. Secondary: 64% of faculty indicated
that the methodology is comparable to that used in a traditional course. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|
|
Unit/Team: Extended Learning |
Reported By: L. Henderson |
|
Date Submitted: 7/11/06 |
Assessment Period: 2005-2006
Academic year |
|
|
|
|
Related College Goal: 8: Be
innovative in our approach to teaching, learning, and support services |
|
|
Expected Outcome: Students in
Extended Learning courses will receive feedback from their instructors in a
timely manner |
|
|
Outcome Assessment: Faculty will
answer question 3 related to the return rate of material to students on the
Extended Learning Faculty Survey. |
|
|
Performance Targets: Primary Target: 90% of faculty
will indicate that they return material in a timely fashion. Secondary Target: 60% of said
faculty will indicate that the technological aspects of their course allowed
them to return material in a more timely fashion that in a traditional
course. |
|
|
Summary of Data Collected
(Performance Results): Primary: 91% of faculty
indicated that they return material in a timely fashion. Secondary: 64% of said faculty
indicated that the technological aspects of their course allowed them to
return material in a more timely fashion that in a traditional course. |
|
|
Recommended Actions: |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: Follow-up on Recommended
Actions: |
|